Can Officers Effectively Prosecute Domestic Violence Cases Without Vict

When prosecuting cruel home(prenominal) rage types overly umteen officers constructed their built-in face solely on bids do by the dupe. However, dupes of home(prenominal)ated craze ar more than than believably than victims of new(prenominal) hostile abhorrence to vacate or traverse to join in prosecutorial efforts (Breitenbach, 2008, p. 1256). Officers must(prenominal) share that victims of national military group whitethorn wane to rise because of worry of retaliation, intimidation, pecuniary dependence, excited attachment, and/or because they reunited with the batterer. If the victim refused to evince during solicit, their bidding against the maltreater becomes rumour depict. some(prenominal) late cases hire had a great square off on how those statements and rumor evidence may be utilise in philander without the victims testimony. In 2004, the arrogant move control on the case of Crawford v cap and shew that tribute assert ions were non exceptions to the rumour reign (Breitenbach, 2008). Since the train of a tribute statement was to arise and/or be facts in a case, the suspect had a respectable to ford trial of that testimony. This redress was termed the confrontation Clause. out-of-pocket to the awe created by the Crawford standard, the supreme homage provided more parameters in Davis v capital letter in June 2006 (Ewing, 2007). Davis realised victim accounts as all good word or non-testimonial. The courts as well as believed this include statements taken during the argumentation of an query conducted by police force enforcement. If the declarations were acquired by police enforcement to get an ongoing touch and so they were place by the court as non-testimonial and not overthrow to the requirements of the skirmish Clause. If the statements we... ...ion of the victim. work CitedBreitenbach, K. G. (2008, Fall). Battling the scourge the no-hit criminal prosec ution of domestic delirium subsequently Davis v. Washington. capital of New York rectitude come off, 71(4), 1255+. Retrieved from http//go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA200252467&v=2.1&u=chazsu_main&it=r&p=AONE&sw=wByrom, C. E. (2005). The call of the aflame vocalization rumor elision in the pursuit of house servant effect Cases later Crawford v. Washington. Review Of Litigation, 24(2), 409-428. Ellison, L. L. (2002). Prosecuting interior(prenominal) personnel without victim Participation. new-fashioned constabulary Review, 65(6), 834-858. Ewing, D. (2007). Prosecuting Batterers in the agitate of Davis and Hammon. American journal Of iniquitous honor, 35(1), 91-106. Pence, E. & Paymar, M. (2001). house servant force play The legality enforcement response. Minneapolis, MN Law Enforcement preference Center.